| Author |
Message |
Pippy |
|
 |
Post subject: Update to NAF Tournament Approval Document (Dec 2011)
 Posted: Jan 10, 2012 - 10:36 AM
|
|
Joined: Jun 02, 2004
South Shields, Tyne & Wear, UK
Posts: 275
Location: South Shields, Tyne & Wear, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
daloonieshaman |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jan 10, 2012 - 10:49 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 28, 2003
Greater Los Angeles CA USA
Posts: 823
Location: Greater Los Angeles CA USA
Status: Offline
|
|
Pippy,
Thank you for this update.
I would advise that you change the file to .pdf or html for about a million different reasons
Along with this I recommend you place the name and contact info of Os from the top down to at least regional. Yes it will change, but you got nothin' else to do  ...
D |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Pippy |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 03:37 AM
|
|
Joined: Jun 02, 2004
South Shields, Tyne & Wear, UK
Posts: 275
Location: South Shields, Tyne & Wear, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
Hi DLS, will get onto updating the list asap (as discussed over pm). Any more info required just let me know.
Brendan |
_________________
NAF Tournament Director
http://twitter.com/OfficialNAF
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Clan_Skaven |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jan 17, 2012 - 11:44 PM
|
|
Joined: Aug 19, 2003
Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Posts: 2341
Location: Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Just a question....
If a tournament has been approved for a number of years in the past (along with all its rules alterations) , under this new procedure, is there a chance that the same tourney could now not be approved?
There are some tourneys i have been to that the rules are altered somewhat more than normal, & I'd hate to see them suddenly not approved.
All in all it looks like a well done form, & I hope it makes things run more smoothly & efficient for all involved. |
_________________
"2006 SPIKE Champion!"
"Death-Bowl IV & V, Most Casualties!, Death-Bowl VI Best Team!"
"2008 Dagger Bowl Champion"
Host of the Warpstone Cup & the Hope Bowl
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Doubleskulls |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jan 18, 2012 - 01:17 AM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Mar 05, 2003
Kent, UK
Posts: 2628
Location: Kent, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
| You'd have to assume so, since there are several changes to the rules. For example I don't think it was ever previously mandated you had to be CRP & allow all 24 teams. |
_________________
Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
SLOBB
NAF Racial Results
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Notorious_jtb |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jan 18, 2012 - 01:31 PM
|
|
Joined: Sep 02, 2005
Ottawa, Capital of the Fair nation of Canada
Posts: 1131
Location: Ottawa, Capital of the Fair nation of Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
@ Clan Skaven, I hear where you are coming from sir. We will do our best in Canada to both abide by the new document AND maintain the historic tournament flavour in Canada. There are some things we could tone down a little but equally keep the key flavour aspect.
In short, don't worry  |
_________________
National Tournament Organiser for Canada
NAF Canada is accepting submissions for articles on the history of Canadian Blood Bowl.
http://nafcanada.blogspot.com/
http://www.facebook.com/naf.canada
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
